The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
From: "Clive D. W. Feather" <cl...@on-the-train.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 22:57:29 +0100
Local: Sat, Apr 8 2006 5:57 pm
Subject: Re: Mill Hill East
In article <1144406478.662332.260...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ian.macl...@siemens.com writes >The other flaw in the main arguments are a "through service", a The current through service is to Morden or Kennington. >"through service" to what exactly? Camden? Change. Bank? Change. >Euston? Change. >The notion of reducing train lengths incidentally to save costs is No, there wouldn't. The Northern Line trains are 3-car units, coupled in >ridiculous in this instance because there would have to be customised >rolling stock for a branch line. pairs to make 6-car trains. You could run a single unit as the shuttle. This whole thing is *just* like the Chesham branch: shuttle off-peak, -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||